The other day my young son was watching one of the many politically correct, liberal indoctrination shows that passes for childhood entertainment/educational programming. The theme of that particular episode was "diversity". He asked, "Daddy, is diversity a good thing or a bad thing? The people on the show say its a great thing but I'm not so sure". I said, "Well, what does diversity mean?". He responded plainly, "Diversity means no white people". When I asked how he came to that conclusion he said it was because the show kept talking about how great diversity is, but that all of the people on the show were every color but white. Thank god my son has the will and I have the ability to shape natural blind curiosity into logical critical analysis and skepticism.
Equality really only means every form of bias against white people, especially men, and in favor of everyone who is not white.
There are many many examples and I will begin listing them as they come up in news stories from unbiased sources. Here is one to start:
Black Ann-Arbor School Principle includes only black students in field trips and clubs.
We have been fooled. We bought into this idea of no discrimination for or against anyone based on skin-color. That it should not be a determining factor. But it is, and it works against us. Unfortunately our tolerance of, generosity towards, and acceptance of "diverse" peoples and cultures has been, and continues to be, used as a weapon against us.
Not us white people. Us AMERICANS.
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Bloomberg: Demonization of tea-parties= good, Demonization of Muslims=bad
Before ANY information was known about any actual "failed bomb" suspect, NYC Mayor Bloomberg said:
"If I had to guess twenty-five cents this would be exactly that, somebody who’s homegrown, maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda, that doesn’t like the health care bill or something."
This was obviously a demonization of the tea-parties "or something". The recent hard-line taken by the Obama Administration and other Democratic Party operatives against any dissent concerning the Federal Government leads one to the only possible conclusion: domestic dissenters are terrorists and any Islamic person that tries to kill Americans is simply a mentally deranged person.
So- there and elsewhere we have inflammatory anti-right wing rhetoric, a demonization of the average dissenting American, talk from Obama that "if they (the right wing) bring a knife, we'll bring a gun" and "...argue with your friends and neighbors, get in their faces..." not to mention the very many other things said by other members of the democrat machine.
Now, when the actual person responsible for the the failed attempt at detonating a bomb on a crowded NYC street is found to be a MUSLIM, Bloomberg has this to say: "We will not tolerate any bias or backlash against Pakistani or Muslim New Yorkers,'' especially not muslim New Yorkers who try to kill dozens of people or who effectively use terroristic threats to censor a world famous television show!
I don't get it. Do they want a revolution or some form of civil war in this country? The rhetoric, actions and sheer asinine bias against anything AMERICAN by those currently in power are driving the mainstream right into the welcoming arms of "the extreme right wing". These asshats are literally shoving the center of America to the far right.
Things will either change for the better within five years, or near the end of that five year period, The United States of America will come entirely apart.
We are no longer simply looking at a difference in views of how to reach the same goal as a Nation. We are looking at different goals altogether. Americans not only disagree on the most fundamental principles of Government, the principles of Government advocated by the differing parties are in extreme and vehement opposition. This opposition can only reach a certain level of intensity before force is brought to bear and the Country comes apart. As Obama drags us slowly into a form of corporate democratic socialism (the corporations representing public ownership), the center of the Nation moves to the right, and surprise, The Department of Homeland Security states that right wing extremism is the greatest threat to the Nation.
"If I had to guess twenty-five cents this would be exactly that, somebody who’s homegrown, maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda, that doesn’t like the health care bill or something."
This was obviously a demonization of the tea-parties "or something". The recent hard-line taken by the Obama Administration and other Democratic Party operatives against any dissent concerning the Federal Government leads one to the only possible conclusion: domestic dissenters are terrorists and any Islamic person that tries to kill Americans is simply a mentally deranged person.
So- there and elsewhere we have inflammatory anti-right wing rhetoric, a demonization of the average dissenting American, talk from Obama that "if they (the right wing) bring a knife, we'll bring a gun" and "...argue with your friends and neighbors, get in their faces..." not to mention the very many other things said by other members of the democrat machine.
Now, when the actual person responsible for the the failed attempt at detonating a bomb on a crowded NYC street is found to be a MUSLIM, Bloomberg has this to say: "We will not tolerate any bias or backlash against Pakistani or Muslim New Yorkers,'' especially not muslim New Yorkers who try to kill dozens of people or who effectively use terroristic threats to censor a world famous television show!
I don't get it. Do they want a revolution or some form of civil war in this country? The rhetoric, actions and sheer asinine bias against anything AMERICAN by those currently in power are driving the mainstream right into the welcoming arms of "the extreme right wing". These asshats are literally shoving the center of America to the far right.
Things will either change for the better within five years, or near the end of that five year period, The United States of America will come entirely apart.
We are no longer simply looking at a difference in views of how to reach the same goal as a Nation. We are looking at different goals altogether. Americans not only disagree on the most fundamental principles of Government, the principles of Government advocated by the differing parties are in extreme and vehement opposition. This opposition can only reach a certain level of intensity before force is brought to bear and the Country comes apart. As Obama drags us slowly into a form of corporate democratic socialism (the corporations representing public ownership), the center of the Nation moves to the right, and surprise, The Department of Homeland Security states that right wing extremism is the greatest threat to the Nation.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Open Letter to the Militia(s)
One thing for people to consider is that there are two forms of real law and everything else is bs. The first form is the Constitution and it emerged after thousands and thousands of years of evolution of the second form of real law, as the concrete materialization of that law. The second form of real law is CONSENSUS which develops to CUSTOM and becomes TRADITION.
The militia generally have the first form of real law behind them, fueling the legitimacy of their cause. But often enough the first form of real law is perceived as being at odds with the second form of real law. This perception was the masterstroke of despots, both government and corporate. It is half a result of collective sleepy mental laziness and cowardice, and half a result being divided against ourselves as a Nation.
As The Nation beings to awaken (slowly) the false perception of the division and opposition of the first and second forms of real law, begins to dissipate. If militia action is taken too early before consensus is reunited with constitution, the entire thing will backfire building a consensus against the constitution and any military formation that orients its self around the constitution. There must be a consensus that any action taken by the militia is legitimate or we risk losing everything forever. That is the difference, for most people, between a terrorist and a freedom fighter. Regardless of what the relativists tell you, ONE MANS FREEDOM FIGHTER IS NOT ANOTHER MANS TERRORIST.
Terrorists aim to defeat the will of the people, freedom fighters aim to manifest that will as constitutional representative government and free society.
So, who is the militia? The face hidden behind the black mask striking fear into his neighbors or the face of the neighbor himself, the unity of the community in defiance of tyranny?
Only we can answer that.
The militia generally have the first form of real law behind them, fueling the legitimacy of their cause. But often enough the first form of real law is perceived as being at odds with the second form of real law. This perception was the masterstroke of despots, both government and corporate. It is half a result of collective sleepy mental laziness and cowardice, and half a result being divided against ourselves as a Nation.
As The Nation beings to awaken (slowly) the false perception of the division and opposition of the first and second forms of real law, begins to dissipate. If militia action is taken too early before consensus is reunited with constitution, the entire thing will backfire building a consensus against the constitution and any military formation that orients its self around the constitution. There must be a consensus that any action taken by the militia is legitimate or we risk losing everything forever. That is the difference, for most people, between a terrorist and a freedom fighter. Regardless of what the relativists tell you, ONE MANS FREEDOM FIGHTER IS NOT ANOTHER MANS TERRORIST.
Terrorists aim to defeat the will of the people, freedom fighters aim to manifest that will as constitutional representative government and free society.
So, who is the militia? The face hidden behind the black mask striking fear into his neighbors or the face of the neighbor himself, the unity of the community in defiance of tyranny?
Only we can answer that.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Speaks for its self......
Obama Says:"What troubles me is when I hear people say that government is inherently bad,"
Thomas Paine says:
“Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.”
Henry David Thoreau says:
"That government is best which governs least."
Patrick Henry says:
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
Thomas Jefferson says:
“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
Mr. Obama, are you so troubled then by the words of our Founding Fathers?
Obama says:
"When our government is spoken of as some menacing, threatening foreign entity, it ignores the fact that in our democracy, government is us."
what?
".....it ignores the fact that in our democracy, government is us."
Our Government most certainly is NOT US. I do not ever remember receiving fortunes from huge corporations, or being offered any kind of position on a Board of Directors, or even as a high paid "consultant" after my current job had run its term.
What world does Obama live in anyways? What would cause even him to think for a second that
anyone would buy into his verbal feces stating that "the government is us" or that "anti-government sentiment" is somehow concerning.
There can be no clearer proof that the highest level of Government is totally and entirely out of touch with the People than Obama and pretty much everything he says and does. Obama is not merely an excuse for a Leader that we are given as some kind of pacification tool, he is a loud and obnoxious roar of laughter in our faces.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
S.510 The Criminalization of Family Farms and of Self Sufficiency
H. R. 2749 The "Food Safety Modernization Act" has passed the House and is being considered by the Senate as S.510. Under the guise of "Food Safety" this act effectively would remove any right that any person has to grow and distribute food without going through a series of regulatory pay-offs which only the largest companies in the food industry could afford. A more appropriate name for this act would be, "The Criminalization of Family Farms and Self-Sufficiency Act".
Additionally, the Bill outlaws the keeping or distribution of any seed from which could grow any kind of food produce. It brings US food production and distribution into compliance with the World Health Organizations, "Codex Alimentarius", a codified system of control over global food production and distribution.
The key to whether this Bill will result in the ultimate centralized control of food production and distribution (the death of real self-sufficiency), or whether it is just a serious set-back in our ongoing struggle for freedom in America is this amendment: "To limit the traceback and recordkeeping requirements for facilities with adjusted gross incomes of less
than $500,000."
Here is what small farmers have to say about it, and this also.
Here is what is going on:
Somehow the sustainability people have caught onto something huge. Urban farming, sustainable, environmentally friendly agriculture, the organic foods movement- these movements are catalyzing a general self-sufficiency movement in the US. They have figured out that this huge, centralized, food distribution system is really inefficient, harmful to the environment, and not empowering to the average citizen, especially the lower classes. The movement is on the precipice of making self-sufficiency a centerpiece of 'social justice'. Read that again. Its really amazing.
Imagine that! Small family farmers (even in urban areas) being self-sufficient in terms of both finance and food, growing a product and selling it locally. From ghetto parasite to green entrepreneur in a single generation. I love it.
Those who benefit directly from the gigantic dysfunctional corpro-bureaucracy that is the centralized food production and distribution system are doing everything they can to kill the self-sufficiency movement before it really gains any ground.
That is what this Bill really is all about.
As Bob Marley sings: "Every time I plant a seed, He said kill it before it grow He said kill them before they grow..."
Listen to the lyrics, Bob Marley was a prophet....
Additionally, the Bill outlaws the keeping or distribution of any seed from which could grow any kind of food produce. It brings US food production and distribution into compliance with the World Health Organizations, "Codex Alimentarius", a codified system of control over global food production and distribution.
The key to whether this Bill will result in the ultimate centralized control of food production and distribution (the death of real self-sufficiency), or whether it is just a serious set-back in our ongoing struggle for freedom in America is this amendment: "To limit the traceback and recordkeeping requirements for facilities with adjusted gross incomes of less
than $500,000."
Here is what small farmers have to say about it, and this also.
Here is what is going on:
Somehow the sustainability people have caught onto something huge. Urban farming, sustainable, environmentally friendly agriculture, the organic foods movement- these movements are catalyzing a general self-sufficiency movement in the US. They have figured out that this huge, centralized, food distribution system is really inefficient, harmful to the environment, and not empowering to the average citizen, especially the lower classes. The movement is on the precipice of making self-sufficiency a centerpiece of 'social justice'. Read that again. Its really amazing.
Imagine that! Small family farmers (even in urban areas) being self-sufficient in terms of both finance and food, growing a product and selling it locally. From ghetto parasite to green entrepreneur in a single generation. I love it.
Those who benefit directly from the gigantic dysfunctional corpro-bureaucracy that is the centralized food production and distribution system are doing everything they can to kill the self-sufficiency movement before it really gains any ground.
That is what this Bill really is all about.
As Bob Marley sings: "Every time I plant a seed, He said kill it before it grow He said kill them before they grow..."
Listen to the lyrics, Bob Marley was a prophet....
Rulers and Leaders I: How Rulers Rule
To Rule is to exercise control over other people through two methods:
1. Coercive force
2. Facilitation of dependency on the Ruler
Facilitation of dependency simply means guiding into being a situation where the Ruler is one of the few, if not the only, source of a nescessary resource. Necessary resources are things like food, shelter, energy, defense against crime, and a relatively stable social environment. Not to mention the one thing that ties all of these elements together: money.
Historically the Rule has been Coercion as the primary means, and Dependency as the secondary means. As a civilization, the West has evolved to the point where the Rule is by facilitation of dependency as the primary means, and coercive force as the secondary means. This IS a step forward, and is perhaps at the root of what we celebrate as the greatness of the modern world. It is the progress won in the 20th century and due credit is owed those who made this advancement. However, this is no longer the 20th century and western civilization, especially America is demanding further progress.
In our current situation in America, there are three levels of dependency.
This is a work in progress and will be continued soon.
1. Coercive force
2. Facilitation of dependency on the Ruler
Facilitation of dependency simply means guiding into being a situation where the Ruler is one of the few, if not the only, source of a nescessary resource. Necessary resources are things like food, shelter, energy, defense against crime, and a relatively stable social environment. Not to mention the one thing that ties all of these elements together: money.
Historically the Rule has been Coercion as the primary means, and Dependency as the secondary means. As a civilization, the West has evolved to the point where the Rule is by facilitation of dependency as the primary means, and coercive force as the secondary means. This IS a step forward, and is perhaps at the root of what we celebrate as the greatness of the modern world. It is the progress won in the 20th century and due credit is owed those who made this advancement. However, this is no longer the 20th century and western civilization, especially America is demanding further progress.
In our current situation in America, there are three levels of dependency.
- The first level is financial dependency; relying on Rulers to pay the way of the Dependents. This is all types of tax-funded welfare, from food to housing, to health care.
- The second level is subsistence dependency- the Rulers that those who pay their own way rely on to sell them food, energy, health care and social stability. This second level of Dependent has a job and buys their own food, energy, and health-care from a very limited number of suppliers who themselves are simply appendages of a larger centrally organized system of manufacture and distribution. The social-stability that results is one that is based in corporate marketing and results in a social hierarchy scaled by material consumption: the more a Dependent consumes of marketing-determined high-cost items, the higher the Dependent is considered to be on the social ladder.
- The third level is lethal-force dependency- The Dependents rely on the Rulers to provide for the defense-by-force of their lives and property and rights.
This is a work in progress and will be continued soon.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Ground Zero: Oklahoma
Bill outlawing militias passes OK House. If this Bill becomes Law, it would be illegal in the State of Oklahoma to organize any "military group" without the authorization of the Government of the State of Oklahoma.
Some definitions:
Militia:
1 a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2 : the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service.
Military (group):
1 a : of or relating to soldiers, arms, or war b : of or relating to armed forces; especially : of or relating to ground or sometimes ground and air forces as opposed to naval forces
2 a : performed or made by armed forces b : supported by armed force
3 : of or relating to the army
So how exactly will this law be interpreted by law-enforcement? The definition of "military" is incredibly vague. A reasonable, if extreme, definition of "military group" would be any organized gathering that involves in any way, lethal weapons, especially firearms. So it would be reasonable to assume that potentially every hunting club, firearms club (including the NRA), shooting club, or even shooting range, could be defined as a "militia" and its founders arrested and prosecuted for "organizing a military group without the authorization of the State of Oklahoma.
This Bill is a direct contradiction of Oklahoma's own Constitution which states in no uncertain terms:
This bill coming quick on the heals of this:
Lawmakers and tea-party wants militia formed. These individuals simply want to re-institute the OK State defense force.
Even more baffling is this-
Oklahoma Fire arms freedom act Oklahoma, along with Arizona, is soon to have some of the most liberal fire-arms regulations in the Nation.
Oklahoma, like the rest of America is obviously going through a period of transition and is being pulled between two opposite forces. None of it really seems to make sense until we look closely and realize this: that in OK, just as in the rest of America, there are people who want to be free and exercise their rights peacefully, and there are others in OK, just as in the rest of America, who think they have the right to use force to tell other people what they are allowed to do.
You have a boot and you have a neck, and in OK, just as the people beneath the boot are making a mighty push to get it off their necks, the boot is trying to push down even harder.
THAT will lead only to more resistance from below, and I can almost guarantee that because of the Bill to outlaw Militias, whether or not it becomes Law, militias will grow in both strength and number in OK.
The boot will be removed from their necks one way or the other.
Some definitions:
Militia:
1 a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2 : the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service.
Military (group):
1 a : of or relating to soldiers, arms, or war b : of or relating to armed forces; especially : of or relating to ground or sometimes ground and air forces as opposed to naval forces
2 a : performed or made by armed forces b : supported by armed force
3 : of or relating to the army
So how exactly will this law be interpreted by law-enforcement? The definition of "military" is incredibly vague. A reasonable, if extreme, definition of "military group" would be any organized gathering that involves in any way, lethal weapons, especially firearms. So it would be reasonable to assume that potentially every hunting club, firearms club (including the NRA), shooting club, or even shooting range, could be defined as a "militia" and its founders arrested and prosecuted for "organizing a military group without the authorization of the State of Oklahoma.
This Bill is a direct contradiction of Oklahoma's own Constitution which states in no uncertain terms:
Section II-3: Right of assembly and petition.
The people have the right peaceably to assemble for their own
good, and to apply to those invested with the powers of
government for redress of grievances by petition, address, or
remonstrance.
Note that the word "militia" or "firearms" or "military" do not occur a
single time in the above statement.
This bill coming quick on the heals of this:
Lawmakers and tea-party wants militia formed. These individuals simply want to re-institute the OK State defense force.
Even more baffling is this-
Oklahoma Fire arms freedom act Oklahoma, along with Arizona, is soon to have some of the most liberal fire-arms regulations in the Nation.
Oklahoma, like the rest of America is obviously going through a period of transition and is being pulled between two opposite forces. None of it really seems to make sense until we look closely and realize this: that in OK, just as in the rest of America, there are people who want to be free and exercise their rights peacefully, and there are others in OK, just as in the rest of America, who think they have the right to use force to tell other people what they are allowed to do.
You have a boot and you have a neck, and in OK, just as the people beneath the boot are making a mighty push to get it off their necks, the boot is trying to push down even harder.
THAT will lead only to more resistance from below, and I can almost guarantee that because of the Bill to outlaw Militias, whether or not it becomes Law, militias will grow in both strength and number in OK.
The boot will be removed from their necks one way or the other.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
